Objectives: to validate a nutritional intervention programme for somewhat old people living in nursing to one's homes Design: in a prospective.

Objectives: to validate a nutritional intervention programme for somewhat old people living in nursing to one's homes Design: in a prospective, randomized, controll inquiry of 88 residents, we determined nutritional status at day 0 and day 60 using a record of dietary intake, anthropometry, hand-grip solidity and mini-nutritional assessment. Dietary intake, grip impregnability and body weight were also recorded at day 30 We divided make submissives into four groups according to their mini-nutritional assessment score. Those with a score 24 received no oral supplementation. Those at risk of malnutrition (with a score of 17-235) were randomized to oral supplementation. Those with a score <17 received oral supplementation. We recorded the amount of oral complements consumed daily. Results: compliance with oral supplementation was pious and daily intake averaged about 400 kcal. The total capacity of work intake on day 60 was significantly higher in the two of the groups that received appendixs Following supplementation, most subjects at risk of malnutrition improved their mini-nutritional assessment score and increased their weight (by 14 +/- 05 kg) Neither the mini-nutritional assessment score nor weight improved in exposes at risk of malnutrition who did not receive add tos Supplementation in the malnourished cluster resulted in a mean mini-nutritional assessment score increase (from 139 +/- 26 to 171 +/- 39) and a mean weight gain of 15 +/- 04 kg Conclusion: oral nutritional complements are well accepted and deduction in increased daily protein and zeal intake, body weight and nutritional status in principally malnourished patients and in those at risk of malnutrition.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Oxford University Press

COPYRIGHT 2000 Gale Group